Journals/Resources
Art Links
Labels
- Agamben (6)
- Althusser (2)
- Art/Art Theory (14)
- Badiou (5)
- Beckett (1)
- Benjamin (3)
- Bergson (1)
- Blanchot (3)
- Blanchot Boredom Poetry/Poetics (1)
- Blogs/Blogging (1)
- Cavailles (1)
- Deleuze (6)
- Deleuze and Guattari (3)
- Dreams (2)
- Eventality (1)
- Events (3)
- Gramsci (1)
- Hallward (1)
- Hegel (1)
- Ideology (2)
- Insomnia (2)
- Jean-Luc Nancy (8)
- Laclau (1)
- Lautman (1)
- Mathematics (2)
- Meillassoux (1)
- Multiplicity (5)
- Ontology (2)
- Philosophy comedy (1)
- Politics (18)
- Ranciere (2)
- Serres (1)
- Spinoza (1)
- Spivak (1)
- Tiqqun (1)
- Toscano (1)
- Tronti (1)
- Virno (1)
- Writing (2)
- Zizek (7)
- Zupancic (1)
the debate between Tarde and Durkheim
Now this looks interesting.
Saturday, January 17, 2009 | Filed Under | 3 Comments
Comments
"All our writing - for everyone and if it were ever writing of everyone - would be this: the anxious search for what was never written in the present, but in a past to come." - Maurice Blanchot
Contact: keith.tilford@gmail.com
Blogroll
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ian Macdonald NZ photographer2 days ago
-
-
-
-
God and Mytho-Poetic Thought3 days ago
-
-
-
-
Tuesday Morning Walk5 days ago
-
-
heart vs. character1 week ago
-
Dark Nights of the Universe @ Recess1 week ago
-
Herb Blau1 week ago
-
-
Ranciere in London (13 June)2 weeks ago
-
Killing Animals in Video Games2 weeks ago
-
-
-
Idle Thoughts on Political Strategy in the UK1 month ago
-
Eternity1 month ago
-
Blanchot on Borges1 month ago
-
Updated Reading Schedule2 months ago
-
Archeology of Espionage2 months ago
-
Three events this week ...2 months ago
-
SCMS response2 months ago
-
-
-
Gun Control5 months ago
-
Kierkegaard and the Political5 months ago
-
No better way5 months ago
-
The Logic of Jeremy Hunt7 months ago
-
Co-opted Mandate9 months ago
-
468px-Caspar_David_Friedrich_0329 months ago
-
-
-
Find me here: …1 year ago
-
SOPA Strike1 year ago
-
retirement1 year ago
-
Rihanna We Found Love1 year ago
-
New Blog: Morbid Symptoms1 year ago
-
Uncomfortable Science1 year ago
-
Maison Marx1 year ago
-
Update1 year ago
-
Politics and Ontology - CFP1 year ago
-
-
New Blog2 years ago
-
-
-
Suspension2 years ago
-
Mathematics of the trace2 years ago
-
the sonic in the political and the social2 years ago
-
Moved to Wordpress2 years ago
-
Radical Philosophy at Work3 years ago
-
The Autophagic University3 years ago
-
Obama's Shot at the Wall3 years ago
-
An invitation, says Raqs3 years ago
-
Badiou Rap3 years ago
-
-
-
The Big Other Finally Noticed4 years ago
-
exo-media4 years ago
-
holiday coming up4 years ago
-
Conference Announcement4 years ago
-
...............4 years ago
-
-
Borges and Spinoza: Ground Glass5 years ago
-
A chance meeting6 years ago
-
-
-
-
-

i posted the Benjamin/modernism reader - it is divided between secondary papers about Benjamin's aesthetics with some more postmodern stuff thrown in (zizek's book "ridiculous sublime")
what is this about durckheim? i can't read the paper.
Odd, I'm not having problems with the pdf. Here's the description from the article:
"A momentous debate concerning the nature of sociology and its relation to other sciences took place between Gabriel Tarde and Emile Durkheim at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes Sociales in 1903. Unfortunately the only available record of the event is a brief overview which English readers may find in Terry Clark's 1969 edited volume On Communication and Social Influence (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
The present recension of the debate, therefore, is based on a script consisting of quotations from the works of Gabriel Tarde and
Emile Durkheim, arranged to form a dialogue."
There is apparently a podcast video available of this being acted out by Bruno Latour, Bruno Karsenti, and Simon Schaffer from March 14 2008 at http://www.crassh.cam.ac.uk/events/47/
apologies, it works fine now. this is a really compelling debate on both sides. i studied Durkheim as an undergrad while researching Mauss and the gift economy. not sure if i agree with him here however. The Latour re-enactment sounds pretty cool also. I've been going over We Have Never Been Modern recently - I was discussing the problematic 'standard description' of modernism, or the definition you get in popular anthologies or reference sources.